Being criticized in person by No. 11, No. 3 had no choice but to shut up temporarily.

But No. 7, who was anxious to watch the football match, realized that if this situation continued, he would definitely not be able to catch the football match.

Therefore, he simply asked: "What happened to that old man? We have to believe that he did not run to the door and did not see the child rushing out fifteen seconds after the incident? He just said that to cause

Note, this is what you think, right?"

"This is what you have been discussing until now. The game has started a long time ago, and maybe even goals have been scored! Do what you like, can we do it faster?" No. 7 looked unhappy.

"The old man said he ran to the door!" At this time, Juror No. 5 stopped him and said.

"What difference does it make whether he ran or walked? In short, he arrived at the door, okay?" No. 7 said impatiently.

In fact, the movie is already halfway through at this point, and the characters, attitudes, and changes of each juror have given the audience an impression.

For example, Juror No. 7 was anxious to go back to watch the football game, so he just wanted to end the verdict as soon as possible, but it backfired, so he became a little irritable.

Juror No. 6 also said: "I'm sure he ran away. Is there any problem with that?"

Juror No. 5 also changed from his previous low self-esteem and silence. He said: "But there is no way he can run!"

Juror No. 4 also intervened: "He said he ran from the room to the door!"

"Where is his room?"

"Right at the end of the corridor."

At this time, No. 8 suggested taking a look at the structural configuration diagram of the apartment.

However, his request made No. 10 and others even more dissatisfied, and they directly sarcastically said: "Why don't you just ask them to hold another court session?"

"You are the only one who wants to see..."

"I want to see it too!" No. 4 said firmly.

"I just want to see if an old man with a steep foot can run from his room to the door in fifteen seconds!"

"He said twenty seconds!" No. 3 shouted inexplicably.

"He said fifteen seconds!" No. 8 corrected.

"He said twenty seconds, why do you want to distort the facts?" No. 3 said again.

But at this time, someone else confirmed: "He was indeed talking about fifteen seconds!"

"How does he know how long fifteen seconds is?" No. 3 shouted angrily.

"But he said fifteen seconds, very sure!" Old Man No. 9 said.

"He is an old man, and his head is unclear half the time. How can he be so sure that what he saw is correct?" But by the time he finished speaking, he himself was dumbfounded.

Yes, if this is the case, can his testimony still be trusted?

Others also looked at him in astonishment.

Suddenly, the entire conference room fell into an eerie silence. At this time, Juror No. 4 said: "I don't know what you want to prove, but this old man did see the defendant!"

"So we have to see if what he said is true. He said he heard footsteps upstairs, and the footsteps came all the way to the door. He heard the door open, and heard someone rushing downstairs. He

I ran to the gate and was very sure that the whole process only lasted fifteen seconds!" No. 8 said.

"The murderer ran away!"

"He didn't say that, right?"

"But that's what he said. I believe it is clearly recorded in the court records."

"You should go to the carping convention..." Juror No. 7 joked.

However, Juror No. 6 was dissatisfied: "Why do you still pretend to be smart? The law should be strict!"

"How much is the subsidy for being a jury for one day? Now that you have made me trapped here, what good will it do to you?" Juror No. 7 said unhappily.

Obviously, he didn't want to be a juror at all, or in other words, he just came out of desperation and didn't care about the case at all.

At this time, the bailiff sent the structural diagram of the apartment.

A lame old man gets out of bed, "runs" through the bedroom and corridor to the door, and completes it in 15 seconds. Can he do it?

No. 10 and others all thought that the old man could do it. Of course, at this time, some people began to suspect that the old man could not do it at all because he had sloping feet and had to be supported when walking in the court.

No. 10 asked, why didn’t the lawyer mention this in court?

This question is very ironic.

Juror No. 8 arranged the scene according to the schematic diagram, imitated the steps of the old man, and demonstrated the process. The structure actually took 41 seconds!

But the results came out, but No. 3 still said in a strange manner: "Those are all his speculations. I have seen all kinds of scams, but your demonstration is really amazing. You have such enthusiasm, but

Go sympathize with those young and Dangerous guys. When you hear the stories they make up, you completely forget what the truth is. You can’t lie to me. I’ve had enough!”

"What's wrong with you? You all know that the defendant is guilty, and you must let him escape the punishment of the law!" He roared at the crowd again.

"Are you his executioner?" No. 8 couldn't help but said.

"I'm one of them!" No. 3 said bluntly.

"If there was a death penalty, would you still want to flip the switch yourself?"

"good!"

"Only a madman would think of executing him personally!" No. 8 shook his head.

Everyone else also looked at No. 3 in shock, not expecting him to be so crazy.

"As soon as you got here, you looked like you wanted to do justice for heaven. It was entirely because of your own selfishness that you wanted to see that child sentenced. Are you a psychopath?" No. 8 scolded this time unceremoniously.

.

This seemed to anger No. 3, and he was about to rush forward, but fortunately he was stopped by others, but he still shouted: "I'm going to kill him, I'm going to kill him!"

This scene seemed extremely ironic, because before this, he himself had said that anyone who could say something like "I'm going to kill you" must have been thinking the same thing at the time and was very serious.

"You don't really want to kill me, do you?" No. 8 heard this and looked at him with a smile and asked.

I don't know if he thought of what he said before, but No. 3 broke away from the others, then turned around and walked away.

The bailiff opened the door and came in to ask if something was wrong?

The foreman of the jury said that there was just a little dispute.

After the bailiff left, everyone looked at Juror No. 3 with strange eyes.

At this time, Juror No. 11 stood up and said: "We are not here to quarrel. I think we should be regarded as shouldering heavy responsibilities. I have always felt that this is the advantage of Hong Kong Island's insistence on the jury system. We

Being told to come here and decide whether someone we have never met is guilty or not, no matter what the verdict is, we gain nothing and lose nothing. That's why we keep using this system. We don't

This kind of thing should be related to personal feelings!"

After hearing what No. 11 said, everyone calmed down a bit.

Soon, No. 6 proposed another vote.

The jury foreman had to prepare papers for anonymous voting again, but No. 10 asked why it was necessary to remain anonymous?

Vote quickly and in order.

Another person changed his mind. The first one was Juror No. 2, who voted not guilty.

Nos. 3 and 4 still insist on their guilt.

In addition to No. 5, No. 6 and No. 11 also changed their minds and voted not guilty.

The final vote turned out to be a tie.

6:6!

From 11:1 to 6:6, the amazing thing is that the audience in the theater did not feel bored at all, but became more and more curious.

You know, No. 3 and No. 10, these two people can be said to be the most determined judges of guilt.

Want to convince them? How?

Number 7 is probably the most unhappy, because this means that the discussion will continue, and it means that he has no chance to watch tonight's game.

There was lightning and thunder outside, the sound of rain broke the silence, and it was raining heavily outside the window!

It got dark, the indoor lights were turned on, and the next moment, the fan actually started spinning.

But the debate must continue, because as long as agreement cannot be reached, it must continue.

Reasonable doubt cannot be eliminated and the debate continues.

Juror No. 2 suddenly spoke: "I have one thing I want to say. There is one thing that makes me very confused. I have always felt that something is not right about the fatal injury of the deceased. The angle of the wound is downward!"

No. 3 frowned and interrupted: "You're here again, the lawyers have already discussed this!"

"But I still feel strange, I just feel something is not right!" No. 2 insisted.

"The defendant is only 1.7 meters tall, while his father, the deceased, is 1.85 meters tall. There is such a big difference in their heights. It shouldn't be easy for him to stab down with such a wound, right?" No. 2 said.

This time, No. 3 came to No. 8 and said he would give a demonstration: "Everyone, watch carefully, I will only demonstrate once!"

He demonstrated that short people can do it.
To be continued...