No. 3, angry, angry, angry, still angry!

He is the angriest!

But this role is very important. He is proud and arrogant, but a little illogical. Because he had a falling out with his son, severed the relationship between father and son, and looked at this patricide case with hatred for the younger generation, so he stood on the side of "guilty"

The last and most stubborn person in the position. As an experienced juror, he took quite detailed notes during the jury, so he was also the first to list the case information, mainly from the old man and the woman witness.

According to the testimony, we know how unfavorable the defendant is: the old man not only heard the quarrel between him and his father, but also witnessed his son fleeing; the woman also witnessed the entire murder process from across the street.

It can be said that we have to thank Juror No. 3 for his confidence. He made many of us basically stand on the "guilty" side at the beginning. And this Juror No. 3 doesn't know how to speak, especially when he leaked his words several times and showed off.

The oolong lines highlighted his cute side beneath his hateful appearance.

Juror No. 4. If No. 3 is the most stubborn "BOSS", then No. 4 is really the most powerful "BOSS". No. 4 is my favorite character because the portrayal is so successful. As a securities

Analyst, he has the most confident stance, the most rigorous expression, the clearest logic, the most objective stance, and the most stable emotion. The last sentence "It's strange that I ignored this detail" is a genius stroke of the screenwriter.

He is truly the Sherlock Holmes of the financial world! Such an extremely tough guy is the most troublesome when he is an enemy, but the most reliable when he is a comrade.

As the second person to be convinced, he was actually the final BOSS. If a detail had not been brought up, he would have probably regained the lost ground and even made a comeback - in fact, he created the only one

Reversal, and it was reasonable and powerful. When he announced that he voted "not guilty" and said "because I have a reasonable doubt", I simply shouted long live. Listening to this man's speech is a kind of enjoyment. I have to say

His shortcoming may be that he is too rational.

Juror No. 10, this one should be considered a cannon fodder BOSS, because he has no logic, all he wants is, I don’t want you to think, I want me to feel, his discrimination is straightforward and without any cover-up.
Chapter completed!