After Xiao Liu closed this post, she continued to read other posts.

Not all posts are so crazy about promoting books, otherwise they will be really operating, not what should happen normally. Many posts are discussing Xiao Liu's plot related.

For example, this topic post: [Is the young man in the first story a criminal? I heard the old policeman say that he was the murderer by looking at his eyes! I suddenly felt that the old policeman might be right.]

Reply 1: Yes, and the ending sentence of the young man will kill you next.

I think this arrangement is to illustrate that the purpose of this novel and what lawyers should uphold is to restore procedural justice in an Anglo-American legal system (case law), "referring to the fairness of the judgment process (relative to the judgment result) and the justice of the legal process (relative to the substantive conclusion).

Reply 2: I think it is the murderer

Reply 3: It is meaningless to discuss this issue, you have not understood it at all; even the novelist Xiao Liuping will not be sure whether he is the murderer, and it does not matter whether he is the murderer. It is already very clear in the novel, and I am too lazy to quote it. If I don’t understand, I will go back and read it again. If I don’t understand, don’t read it.

Reply 4: It's meaningless, it's not something that lawyers care about

Reply 5: The ending is similar to the first-level fear. But it doesn't matter who is the murderer (laughs)

Reply 6: It’s the same wherever there is insufficient evidence to declare innocence

Reply 7: The author wants to say: The truth is never seen.

Reply 8: I think the last scene has a tribute to the Simpson case in the United States. As the first floor said, in the world of law, procedural justice is greater than factual justice, which also means that universal justice is greater than individual case justice. Procedural justice is necessary for a complete judicial system.

Of course, this situation may indeed be that the true justice in some cases cannot be fulfilled, but compared to a case in China, a man was sentenced to kill his wife. After eleven years, his wife came back from another place and declared rehabilitation - the latter is still the case. In other words, the fairness of the procedure and the fairness of facts are the game between "I would rather kill one thousand people than kill one person by mistake" and "I can kill one thousand people by mistake" and "I can kill one thousand people by mistake" and "I can kill one thousand people by mistake".

Reply 9: The core of this novel is that what we must strive to safeguard the interests of the client. Whether he is the murderer has nothing to do with whether we conscientiously perform our lawyer's duties. Justice is not the mission of a lawyer, victory is justice.

If you are so entangled with the details after reading this novel, you don’t need to read it for the second time. I am looking forward to it. This author’s second novel must have a sequel, which is absolutely true!!

Reply 10: Form is important, and truth is also important.

Reply 11: I think this case has nothing to do with procedural fairness, because the cross-examination of the case is not all illegally forcing confessions. Moreover, the people inside are not very clear whether the man killed someone, and the facts of Simpson's case are obvious.

Reply 12: The same question has also appeared in "The Good Wife", but whether it is the real murderer has nothing to do with the lawyer. They are only responsible for protecting the interests of the client.

Reply 13: Legally he is no longer a murderer! One crime is sentenced!

Reply 14: I think it is the murderer. The heroine is a brainless person who ruined her wealth and saved the murderer!!!! Annoying! Super annoying!

Reply 15: We are not God, and we will never know the truth! If there is no problem with legal arbitration, we will win!

Reply 16: I said one last time and I will kill you next time. I was so scared that I couldn’t sleep well at night... It was so gloomy that I said⊙﹏⊙‖

Reply 17: It has nothing to do with us whether it is the murderer or not. Why is this the first story? I personally think that this is what the novelist wants to tell us! The truth of the whole case and the lawyer's responsibility are completely different. Yes, the play is very clear. If you are really worried about whether that person is the murderer, then you can only say that you don't understand the meaning of this novel.

To put it simply: whether that person is the murderer is the matter of a detective mystery novel. The main significance of this drama is that the lawyer takes money and helps the client clear the charges.

Reply 18: It should be the murderer, but the lawyer needs to ensure procedural justice, so the truth doesn't matter. This caloric feeling is very similar to a caloric in the British drama "Royal Lawyer", the caloric master of "The Master of Exit", and "First-Level Fear". But it's really scary. For example, after the male protagonist of "The Master of Exit" helped the real murderer to get rid of murder without knowing the truth, he was released from the mountain, resulting in his wife being killed.

Reply 19: Don’t worry about the truth when watching "h", because this novel does not have the perspective of God like other novels and pursue it to the end! So, this is also the special thing about this novel!

Reply 20: There is no sufficient evidence to show that he is the murderer. Think about the emergence of unjust, false and wrong cases...

This post is very popular, and there are a series of replies below. Xiao Liu took a closer look at the number of replies and found that there were 1,341!

"I'm going, Yahoo is really extraordinary. It's Niu x. There are 1,300 replies on a random post. From the Twitter I've been feeling a little proud of yesterday and over 10,000 people responded. Now it seems that I'm still far from it?" Xiao Liu shrugged his shoulders with some self-deprecatingness and continued to read.

I read about 100 replies, and the following replies have begun to be repetitive, so there is no need to continue reading.

Xiao Liu clicked on other posts.

Title: [Why is the profit-oriented Kensuke willing to accept Machiko's 42-year labor contract?]

By the way, isn’t this 42-year labor contract a long-term one?

As long as Machiko did not harm the firm's behavior during the contract, Kensuke would always hire her and pay her a salary.

This setting is too weird. According to Kensuke's usual performance in his novel, shouldn't he sneer at it and then raise the heroine of the morning drama?

Reply 1: Cheap labor~!

Reply 2: Do you want to be serious? In reality, a simple and beautiful girl in her twenties is willing to follow a man. With a working environment in the world of two people, will a normal 38-year-old single man refuse? Will it be OK? Will it be OK?

Reply 3: I remember Gu Meimeng told Miki, "You let the wrong person go" means that he is actually quite optimistic about Xiao Dai!

Reply 4: What the hell is Gu Mei Meng? But what is said upstairs is very correct.

Reply 5: Needless to mention feelings, it is more illusory reason for optimistic about juniors. Just by calculating the economic accounts, you can see that the salary he gave Dai is very low, which is absolutely cost-effective. Dai only owes him 30 million yen in total, and it will take 42 years to pay it back, which means that he only pays 714,000 yuan a year. They said that it is easy to pay it back with 25% of the income. It can be calculated that Dai's annual income is only 714,000 yuan/25%=2.857 million yen, and this income will remain unchanged for 42 years. The income from odd jobs in Yoshinoya, Tokyo is about 1 hour.

100 yen, if you work 8 hours a day, work 22 days a week, and work 12 months a year. The annual income of a handyman in Yoshinoya is 1100*8*22*12=2.323 million. It is basically the same as Dai. Dai's work intensity is definitely greater than 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, right? I won't mention the difference in technical content. In other words, Kumimen uses the salary of a temporary dishwasher and hires a college graduate with a lawyer's license, and this salary level remains unchanged for 42 years! No one wants to...

After seeing the fifth reply and the various data expressed, Xiao Liu couldn't help but burst out laughing. This is really serious!

So, these readers are really cute!
Chapter completed!