In the evaluation that cannot be completely objective, we should look at the negative evaluations.

……………………………………………………………………

It was more than a month ago, the day before Wang Xiaomao, Han Shiqi and Yang Mi returned to Tianjin this time, Wang Xiaomao looked at his news, and the media and public opinion took several "female fans" kissing him, holding his photos, saying that he hooked up with "female fans", and Yang Mi sent six bodyguards to protect him.

Of course, even if Wang Xiaomao saw it, Yang Mi would know it sooner or later if she didn't say it. Don't say she was fine, just check out Wang Xiaomao's entertainment news. Her studio is also helping her pay attention to the news and trends of people related to her.

In fact, during that period, Wang Xiaomao paid more attention to his news than this. He was more concerned about the media and public opinion's evaluation of his crosstalk.

Wang Xiaomao said that he didn't care about these things, or that he didn't want Yang Mi to be criticized because he was willing to withdraw from the entertainment industry at any time. But as long as he was still in this circle, he was doing related things, and with his sensitive and perfect personality, he could not completely ignore these things.

Overall, the outside world commented that Wang Xiaomao's crosstalk was full of talent everywhere. Not only was the typhoon elegant and elegant, but it was said that many times he would come on stage to compile a whole section of crosstalk without any words, but also reflected the steady rhythm of Ma's crosstalk, which made the audience unable to hear it. However, Wang Xiaomao's crosstalk "broken" is not particularly dense, and because of the elegant typhoon, sometimes it seems unreleased, unlike some crosstalk actors named Guo who dare to say anything on stage, making the audience happy to listen.

Some "subjects with the surname Guo"?

Just two now?

Guo Xiaotie and another surnamed Guo.

Of course, the overall evaluation above is a summary made by Wang Xiaomao after screening and scolding. Even so, Wang Xiaomao feels that there is moisture in both positive and negative places.

In his positive evaluation of him, even those who seem to have objective tone, is it because Guo Xiaotie has always praised him? The outside world knows that he has a good relationship with Guo Xiaotie. People who support Guo Xiaotie and those who like him praise him?

In his negative comments, such as "You dare to say anything on stage", in his opinion, it is because some people don't understand crosstalk. In addition, is the emergence of these comments also related to another person named Guo?

Guo Xiaotie and that person looked at each other dislike each other. Wang Xiaomao couldn't say that he didn't like anyone, but he had basically no contact with that person. But Wang Xiaomao worked with Guo Xiaotie and Yu Daqian, and the outside world might divide them into two factions, so there may also be hostile postures and venting anger in these evaluations.

Among the evaluations that cannot be completely objective, Wang Xiaomao thinks that he should look at the negative evaluations more.

Although negative comments may feel a little uncomfortable when anyone looks at them, if you can hold the attitude of correcting them if you have them, and if you don’t, it is still more meaningful. But positive comments are comfortable to look at, but even if they are objective, they can easily inspire pride if you see too much.

Wang Xiaomao felt that the evaluation of his "burdens is not particularly dense" in these media and public opinion is reasonable.

Although he pursues more elegance in the typhoon, the way of crosstalk is to describe small characters and criticize current problems. Because he needs to portray characters, crosstalk is very particular about logic and preparation.

For example, the previous article mentioned that "The Great Bodyguard" adapted by Shao Ma Ye became a template for this passage in the industry to say, because there was a problem with the logic of "The Wagyu Dart". Why is a person who is really good at jumping into the house and crossing the spine and becoming timid and incompetent after the trip?

For example, Guo Xiaotie had an apprentice named Yue Yuniao who once went to the Spring Festival Gala to say a paragraph "Couple of Spring Festival Couplets", which used the sentence "pingxiongpingxiongpingpingxiong" as a joke. However, although this sentence has a good effect, it will be over after listening to it. It is not worth savoring, nor can it be savored. When you listen to the whole paragraph, you will feel an inexplicable sense of embarrassment. If you savor it again, you will feel more and more wrong.

Why? It’s really not that Yue Yuniao is blamed.

Others don’t know, can Wang Xiaomao still not know as an insider? This joke was originally what Yue Yuniao said, and there is the saying “pingxiongpingxiongpingpingxiongpingpingxiong”, so Yue Yuniao said this absolutely right. Yes, it is true, and it is inevitable that people will feel inexplicably embarrassed.

But the original logic is problematic. A person who knows how to recite poems and writes a couple is once a strong side in the play. Why do you only talk nonsense behind and make a fool of yourself by the supporting actor?

Why is Mr. Ma's "Spring Festival Couplet" praised by the industry?

Mr. Ma was really educated among the crosstalk artists of his time, but he did not show off the original sentence during his performance. As soon as he came up, the audience felt that this was a boastful person and had no real skills, so the logic was understandable. Zhao Peiru's later sentence "If you beat your mother before you get married, you will have this couple", so that you can be more logical while being popular.

Wang Xiaomao and Yu Daqian performed the "Eight Great Goods" with Guo Xiaotie and Yu Daqian. Yu Daqian was saying that Guo Xiaotie had already said it in a crooked manner, and if he changed it into a crooked manner, he would have to say it more crookedly than Guo Xiaotie. So even though he pursued a gentle and elegant typhoon, he was really knowledgeable, but he never showed off his knowledge. At that time, his talent in this passage was as mentioned in those comments, all reflected in the editing on stage.

But it is okay to say the logic of crosstalk in this way, it can stand scrutiny, and the characters are portrayed very well. The audience has no trace of performance after listening to it, and experts are highly praised by experts. But now how many viewers care about the logic and character portrayal of a crosstalk?

It is certainly okay for experts and viewers who like this kind of crosstalk, who are patient and understand crosstalk, but now more viewers are just for fun. People hope that you have more "burdens" and less pretense of portraying.

Not to mention now, when crosstalk first first appeared, how could there be more audiences? Crosstalk actors were still exploring themselves, so the audience at that time was just looking for fun.

Whether Wang Xiaomao can change the so-called "negative evaluation" in this regard is the same thing, but it is regarded as a reasonable suggestion.

Of course, it is impossible to make him give up the path of the Ma school and give up his attention to logic and character portrayal. Moreover, he feels that the germination stage is immature, or even a state of failure to try, cannot be called real crosstalk. What he pursues and yearns for is real crosstalk.

But he can respect the audience's wishes, and while ensuring that there is no problem with logic and character portrayal, he should add more "brokenness" to his crosstalk as much as possible. Moreover, he also had the idea of ​​learning and performing talk shows.

He respects the wishes of the audience and hopes that more viewers will understand that crosstalk is crosstalk, talk shows are talk shows...
Chapter completed!