Is this the ancestral precept not to kill scholar-bureaucrats?

Nonsense ancestral teachings!

In the Song Dynasty, there was never an ancestral precept not to kill scholar-bureaucrats!

Those who say that the ancestors of the Song Dynasty taught not to kill scholar-bureaucrats only read street stall marketing articles.

Zhao Kuangyin was born as a soldier, so he didn't kill ministers?

Only fifteen high-ranking officials were recorded in the "History of Song Dynasty: The Benji of Taizu". They were high-ranking officials, at least fourth-rank officials, and they were all killed by Zhao Kuangyin.

This is only what is recorded, what is not recorded, and there is a large area.

Zhao Guangyi also killed them, and the embezzlers were severely punished and killed with heads rolling in.

It was not until Zhao Guangyi dealt with the corrupt official Wang Huai that his brother, the political advisor Wang Mi, interceded for mercy and was saved from death.

This was a bad start. During the Zhenzong period, people stopped killing people.

During the Renzong period, there was no need to kill anyone.

During the Shenzong period, appeasement became the norm!

As a result, corrupt officials throughout the dynasty were tolerated!

Half of the treasury was used to pay the salary, and after receiving the salary, the concubine was raised and the land was acquired.

It has become a cancer creeping on the land of China!

After killing those 37 people, there was still one person who was King Pu. To kill the clan members, you could not just behead them directly, you had to find another method.

But is it over after killing these and ransacking the house?

No, no, no, it’s not over yet!
Chapter completed!