"No matter whether you can beat the prophet or not, there is always a chance that you won't. It is unwise to throw gold and water at the person who has just spoken in the previous position. There is a high probability that a good person will be sold."

"From this point of view, the behavior of player No. 2 is not consistent with a fierce jumping wolf, and there are 2 and 5 double wolves. 2 should be killed by 3, right?"

"The most important thing is that 6 hasn't recognized 4 from the policeman yet. Not to mention 2's crazy dialogue with 4 to canvass votes. Judging from the position pattern, if 2, 4, and 5 are the three wolves, there is player No. 3 in the middle.

Can you not accept the investigation?"

"If he didn't answer the check, does that mean there's a high probability that he's not in the Wolves? This logic and idea were not discussed."

"So, although the prophet 6 is very powerful, I don't want to side with him in the police."

"2Although this prophet is not very powerful, there is nothing to criticize in his overall speech."

"I'll just stand by player No. 2 for now. I'll listen to another round of speeches. I may change my mind, maybe not. We'll talk about it then."

"Okay, that's all I want to say to the police, good guy, that's it, passed."

[Player No. 8 please speak]

"The prophet who jumps between 2 and 6 must be on the side of 6. Player No. 7 also said just now that throwing 6 to 5 will be very powerful in killing. In this case, his fortune as a prophet will be great. If he doesn't side with him, he will

Who is on your side?"

"Actually, as 7 said, if player No. 6 is a wolf, will he kill someone who is hostile to the prophet? There is absolutely no need to do so."

"If he wants to lose the kill, it's best to throw the kill to player No. 7, and then recognize No. 5 to win 5's favor. This is only logical."

"6 being able to kill 5 means that his behavior is not in line with the Wolves' profits, so we can only call him a prophet."

Player No. 8 is on the side of 6. In his opinion, 6 should be the prophet.

If 6 is a fierce jumping wolf, there is no reason to kill player No. 5, unless he has water in his head. A good person who has a high probability of taking advantage of the wolf team, instead of dragging him down, he will advance the prophet team. This

Not logical.

Therefore, Ren Fan is right to say that Player No. 6’s efforts are not only focused on the word “kill”, but also because the person being killed is 5.

Comparing the strength of players 2 and 6, there is no doubt that the police officer wants to side with player No. 6. Any hesitation on his part is a sign of disrespect for this investigation.

"Player No. 7 said that the logic of Game 6 was unsatisfactory and there was no prophet's perspective. I disagree with this."

"Which prophet comes up and claims that his kill is the Crow's Claw? This will give people the illusion that he is trying to arouse the good people's hostility towards 5, so he forcibly claims that 5 is the Wolf's Claw. This

This mentality and behavior are not good.”

"Although Player No. 5's speech does not sound like he has met with No. 2, it does not rule out that he is trying to create an identity for himself. After all, everyone has different ideas. There is no need to make it sound like he has not met No. 2 just because of No. 5's speech.

Yes, you must choose 5 which is the Wolf's Claw."

"What's more, it's not like player No. 6 didn't mention this. I think he didn't talk about 5 being Wolf's Claw just because he thought it was inappropriate."

"And the speech of player No. 5 is indeed not very good. He said that there is a problem with player No. 3 helping 2 to canvass votes. How can there be a problem with this? If he stands by 2 and does not help 2 canvass for votes, who is he canvassing for? Is it possible that he is the so-called just standing by the side?

Just empty words?"

"Player No. 5 likes to show off. If others think differently than him, he will treat others like wolves and judge others by himself. He gives me the feeling that he is too murderous."

"Originally I thought 5 might be a wolf, and 6 was thrown to him for investigation and killing, so naturally I was very willing to stand by 6."

Player No. 8 seems to only agree with Ren Fan's statement that the 6 was thrown to 5 and the killing force was strong, but does not agree with Ren Fan's subsequent remarks that 6's logic is problematic.

He felt that player No. 5 may not be the Claw of Wolf and Crow. Everyone has different ways of playing and thinking about playing with wolves. It is obviously unreasonable to conclude that No. 2 and No. 5 will not meet based on the statement of the No. 5 police officer.

Taking a step back, what if player No. 5 is the Crow's Claw? Who can figure out that he is the Crow's Claw from the very beginning? If he can't figure it out, he is not a prophet?

Ren Chaofan's requirements for player No. 6 are too harsh.

Player No. 8 feels that just by throwing 6 to 5 to kill him, it is enough for people to side with him. Whether the police should turn around or not, we will see the situation at that time.

It would be outrageous for police officer Ren Fan to stand aside for player No. 2.

“Player No. 7, although you are on Side 2, which is different from my side, I don’t think you are a wolf because your powerful speech against Player No. 6 touched my heart.

”

"Although I don't agree with the second half of your statement, I know that you are not trying to beat player No. 6. You are just too harsh on No. 6."

"Do you think that 6, as a prophet, should have thought that 5 is probably the Claw of the Wolf Crow, because 2 and 5 don't look like the wolf teammates they met."

"But in fact, not one of the ten prophets would be able to think of the 5 as the Wolf's Claw, because most people have a subconscious mind, and the police will not be so complicated."

"As I said just now, which prophet would come up and say that the wolf I killed was a big wolf?"

"Maybe you are right. Player No. 5 is the Claw of the Wolf. Player No. 6 did not think of this because he is not thinking well, but this does not mean that he is not a prophet. What do you think?"

"In my eyes, you are a good person who is on the wrong side, and the reason why you are on the wrong side is not that your logic is bad, but that your logic level is too high. If others do not meet your requirements, you feel that the other person is not a prophet, but

Sometimes prophets are not as perfect as you think."

"I hope you can turn around, because I heard that you must be a good person. If you were a wolf, you would only talk about how the second half of 6 is not like a prophet, but not how powerful the first half of 6 is."
p>

"6 is the prophet, 2 and 5 are wolves. My suggestion is to test player No. 3. If 5 is the Crow's Claw, you can't recognize 3 just because 5 is hostile to 3."
p>

"Player No. 1 is most likely a good person, but Player No. 2 probably doesn't have the guts to throw gold at his Wolves teammates who have spoken in front of him."

"The benefits of doing this are very small, or even almost no benefits, but the risks are huge. It will attract the attention of prophets and good people to 1, and once 1 becomes the focus, it will easily lead to identity exposure.

”

"If the prophet wants stability, he will put 1 in the first police badge to test it out just in case. If this is the case, he will be shooting himself in the foot."

"So, I think if 1 and 2 don't meet, there is a high probability that player 1 is a good person. Instead of hitting 1 with the police badge flow, it is better to test player 3."

"Although player No. 3 may be a wolf, judging from the shared relationship, there is a high probability that Player 3 is a good person, so I won't call him a wolf when the police call him, and I will accept it for now."

"Police officer, let's see if he will turn around. If he is still a member of the Wolf Team, he must be put into the first police badge stream for verification."

"Police, player No. 4 should be a good guy. If No. 4 is a wolf, I'm afraid that No. 2 will not give gold to No. 1, but will give No. 3 a kill. Unless No. 2, 3, 4, and 5 are wolves in a row, otherwise,

2 will not have any defensive actions against 3."

"But the possibility of four wolves in a row of 2, 3, 4 and 5 is too low, and the police can't test it, so we can only say that 2 and 4 are not two wolves, and player 2 is not so hostile to 3."<

/p>

"Recognize player No. 4, and if the policeman calls the wolf, it will be a 9. If 9 votes for 6, there is no problem with the policeman's speech. If it doesn't sound like a wolf, you can play the four wolves and call the police."

"Okay, that's all I want to say to the police. Stand by player No. 6, but don't stand to death. That's it. It's over."

[Player No. 10 please speak]

"If 6 is thrown to 5 to kill him, if he stands aside, he will have to play 2 and 5 as two wolves, but to be honest, I don't think 2 and 5 can be two wolves."

"If 2 is a fierce jumping wolf, how much profit can he get by throwing gold water to 1? It's better to throw a check to 3 behind the police."

"Don't worry about whether you can kill the prophet, as long as you kill the enemy, you will still have the strength. As long as you don't attack the idiot, you will still make money even if you kill the Dream Catcher or the Alchemy Witch."

"If the people being checked are civilians, there is a high probability that they can resist being pushed out. Even if the prophet holds the check in the back position, it will not be as powerful as him. When the time comes, the good people will only think that it is a desperate check and kill."

"With such a huge profit, Player 2 chooses to throw gold and water to Player 1. Is it like what a werewolf does?"

Player No. 10’s side is the same as Ren Fan’s. He feels that 2 and 5 cannot make two wolves.

The most important thing is that the act of throwing gold and water from 2 to 1 is not in line with the Wolves' profits.

Obviously there are a lot of benefits and benefits from throwing a kill to player 3, but 2 just throws gold water to player 1. Only a prophet can do this.

When it comes to strength, essentially speaking, player 2 is really powerful, while player 6 is only superficially powerful.

"Actually, in addition to giving 5 a kill, which makes him appear to be very powerful, player No. 6 is also a mess in terms of logic."

"If nothing else, let's talk about police badge flow. How can we get 1 and 2 pairs of wolves? He also said that it is not ruled out that player 1 is the Claw of the Wolf Crow. 2 will throw gold and water to him. If that is the case,

2 just wants to trick player No. 1."

"Because this gold water is not so easy to pick up, the late-position prophet will definitely suspect that 1 and 2 may be two wolves. If we try 1 at that time, we will not even have a chance to activate the skills, and we will be pushed out of the game.

?"

"Player No. 6 can say that 1 and 2 may be two wolves, and even suspects that 1 is the Wolf's Claw, and his perspective is amazing."

"The other one is the one picked by player No. 7. As a prophet, No. 6 should focus on talking about No. 5 being the Wolf's Claw, because No. 5's speech does not sound like he met No. 2."

"In the end, player No. 8 said that this was not a breaking point at all. No prophet would insist on asking the police that his investigation was a big wolf."

"Okay, let's take a step back. This is not the explosive point of player 6. Then he can't even recognize the 4 under the police. Is there something wrong with his logic?"

"The conversation between player No. 2 and No. 4, plus the position pattern of No. 2 and No. 4 being two wolves, must be discussed. There is a high probability that No. 4 is a good person, but was No. 6 mentioned? No."

"Player No. 6 didn't come up with the logic of the game. He was very concerned about the logic of the game. I can't recognize such a prophet."

"I even suspect that player No. 6 throws a kill to 5 just to gain strength. After all, most people think that 6 is a wolf and will not throw a kill to a good guy who is about to be on the wrong side. The fact that he can throw a kill to 5 shows that

He is most likely a wolf."

"Perhaps player No. 6 has this calculation, so in my case, there is no strength in killing 6 to 5."

"Player No. 8 is crazy about giving incitement votes to 6. I think 6 and 8 are most likely two wolves. 5 and 6 are definitely not on the same side. 5 can recognize it."

"Player No. 3 is on the side of 2, and he is working hard to canvass 2's votes. I feel that his gangster profile is not great, at least today I can't think of him as a wolf."
To be continued...