As one of the most popular movies this summer, the media attention attracted by "Trumen's World" is far beyond imagination. This can be seen from the grand occasion of the premiere. After the premiere, the first batch of film reviews presented an extremely lively scene.:efefd

Thirty media outlets released the first batch of film reviews and expressed their views on the "Trumen's World".

As we all know, among many movie types, comedy and horror works are the most difficult to please the audience and critics, because these two types of movies require great efforts in humor and thriller, which often makes the whole story become absurd, and the characters are even fragmented. Everything serves their respective themes. Moreover, the story is limited to a small pattern, making it difficult to create the attractiveness of commercial blockbusters like disasters and action types. Therefore, it is often difficult for these two types of works to make a comeback. Even if there are box office wins, the critics will find it difficult to have a good face.

Especially the comedy type. "Adai and Agua" media comprehensive review scored 41 points, "Fatty Professor" media comprehensive review scored 62 points, "Slim Dad" media comprehensive review scored 53 points, "Disguised Weird" media comprehensive review scored 56 points, "Disguised Weird" media comprehensive review scored 56 points, you can see the dilemma of comedy movies from this series of scores. In recent years, the highest-rated comedy movies in the media comprehensive review were the "King of Talks" released in March last year. The sixty-eight media comprehensive reviews made Jim Carrey regained his excitement.

As a comedy drama movie, "Trumen's World" is under tremendous pressure. How to balance the relationship between humor and theme will become the focus of everyone's attention. But unexpectedly, the three authoritative media of the "New York Times", "Los Angeles Times", and "Chicago Sun" have all agreed to give the movie a full mark. This is also the first time in the long history of the film, which has alarmed the entire North American market.

In fact, even after seeing the ratings of these three major media, people still find it hard to believe that this is a real comedy movie that has received such a high-level review of perfect perfect scores. This is simply incredible, but people's doubts were quickly answered, and the intersection of the first batch of film reviews almost pushed the "Trumen's World" to the best height in film history.

Among the first film reviews, the lowest score was from the San Francisco Chronicle's 75 points. They commented that "This is an attractive work for viewers who are tired of monsters demolishing buildings and superheroes saving the world."

The San Francisco Chronicle comments were very unique. They did not give the film a high praise, but obviously the seventy-five points were far beyond the average level of comedy movies. And they also used words like "attractive" and were still difficult to hide their support for the film even with belittlement and ridicule.

From this comment, we can see that the "San Francisco Chronicle" wanted to criticize the movie, but in fact it was not that easy. So they angrily used sarcasm to divert their attention, but still could not give up their objective and authoritative image. The unfair taste of sour grapes was revealed between the lines, making people laugh, and instead affirmed the excellence of the "Trumen's World".

The same is true. Not only the "San Francisco Chronicle", "New York Post", "USA Today", "Daily News", and "Houston Chronicle" cannot deny the excellence of "Trumen's World". These media have previously had a bad relationship with Hugo. They are always more harsh about Hugo's works and examine them with a picky attitude. But this time, they have no way to find out the flaws.

The New York Post gave 80 points and said unwillingly, "This is also the boldest and most extraordinary attempt on the big screen."

"USA Today" gave eighty-five points, saying briefly and clearly, "It will be the most positive and exciting feedback from Hollywood for a long time."

The comments of "Daily News" are relatively complete. "In order to please the audience, the spirit of entertainment until death has evolved into terror totalitarianism, stripped of love and freedom, and faith has also become a tool of deception. Life has completely become a toy movie, which gives a real and cruel proposition, which is thought-provoking." Similarly, the 88-point evaluation is also the highest level among these "opposing Hugo" media.

The Houston Chronicle commented in just one sentence, "This is a work that will not be forgotten in the 1990s." It seems a bit inappropriate with the 80s evaluation, but they can still see their recognition of the movie.

Among the first batch of comments, these are the "criticism" of the movie. The 75 points of the San Francisco Chronicle, the 80 points of the "New York Post" and the "Houston Chronicle" are the lowest scores in the first round of film reviews. This is not only shocking, but also unimaginable heights. Even in fantasy, no one can imagine that a comedy movie can make the picky and tricky film critics lower their proud heads, but now, the "Trumen's World" has done it.

The lowest score witnessed the average reputation of "Trumen's World", while the highest score witnessed the miracle of "Trumen's World" entering the classics of film history.

The "Chicago Tribune" that has always been uttering amazingly is no exception this time. "Subtle subversion, mockery, backlash of fear, mediocrity and indifferent sadness Hugo Lancaster interprets this adult fairy tale bloody and light, and is worthy of being the nature of a killer." The 100-point full score adds icing on the cake to this evaluation.

The New Yorker also voted for a full score of 100 points, saying in the comments, "Another violent collision between Peter Will and Hugo Lancaster, the film contains surprising ridicule and sarcasm, as well as sneering and criticism of today's entertainment trends. The reflection behind humor makes this comedy stand out."

The comments of the "Washington Post" are simple and clear. "A sunny work about darkness and paranoia." The contradictions and reflections in the words make people curious about the movie, and the 100-point full score shows their admiration for this work.

"U.S. Weekly" said, "A beautiful conspiracy, a daydream throughout the entertainment era, a black comedy that penetrates the soul." They also gave a hundred points without exception.

"Wall Street Journal", again one hundred, "adventure, provocation, even bold"
Chapter completed!